L. Chirico
Ganar
D. Semenistaja
Ganar
Veronica Cepede Royg vs Louisa Chirico Estadísticas cara a cara
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L L W L L
Form
W L L W W W L L W WCara A Cara: Royg 1 - 2 Chirico
Ellas han jugado 8 conjuntos en total, con Royg victoriosa 4 y Chirico victoriosa 4. El último partido entre Royg y Chirico fue en el W25 Sao Paulo, el 16-03-2019, Cuartos de Semifinals, Clay, con Louisa Chirico obteniendo la victoria 6-4 2-6 6-0
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Veronica Cepede Royg | 1 |
| Louisa Chirico | 2 |
W25 Sao Paulo(16-03-2019)
6
4
2
6
6
0
Próxima partido
- / Quarterfinals
IMPARES
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dimitrov VS Jarry PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Andreeva VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 2-6 6-0 |
Stats 
Louisa Chirico
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Louisa Chirico
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 1-6 7-5 7-6(5) | |||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Partidos cara a cara | 2 |
| 4 | Sets Ganados | 4 |
| 39 | Juegos Ganados | 35 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Faltas dobles totales | 7 |
| 0:56:0 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 0:56:0 |
| 62% (81/130) | % De Primer Servicio | 54% (60/111) |
| 51% (41/81) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 58% (35/60) |
| 53% (26/49) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 43% (22/51) |
| 58% (11/19) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 56% (10/18) |
| 49% (54/111) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 48% (63/130) |
| 33% (1/3) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 100% (2/2) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 50% (2/1) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Veronica Cepede Royg
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
80
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
67%
(
84 of
125)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
14
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
46%
(
57 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Snigur
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
65%
(
75 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
52 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
98)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fernanda Contreras Gomez
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
77
Total Points Won
82
|
0-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
82%
(
47 of
57)
0
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Sofia Da Cruz Mendonca
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
40%
(
23 of
58)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
12
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Louisa Chirico
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Cristina Diaz Adrover
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Dominika Salkova
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Louisa Chirico
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Erika Andreeva
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
75%
(
82 of
109)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
48 of
82)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ana Konjuh
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
73)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ysaline Bonaventure
Player
Louisa Chirico
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
42
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Louisa Chirico
57%
(
70 of
123)
1st Serve %
62%
(
85 of
137)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
52 of
85)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
42%
(
52 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
66 of
137)
137
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(6) 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
74%
(
89 of
121)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
56%
(
56 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
64 of
121)
108
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (428/279) | Win/Loss | 56% (331/261) |
| 58% (949/689) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (742/631) |
| 54% (8035/6954) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6573/6177) |
| 52% (117/106) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (125/125) |
| 67% (282/137) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (170/106) |
| 38% (8/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (31/22) |
| 48% (21/23) | Grass Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 366 | Aces Total | 880 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1036 | Total Double Faults | 2054 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:13:18 |
| 537.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 458.93 |
| 65% (16200/25047) | 1st Serve % | 59% (18964/32049) |
| 60% (9722/16200) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (11698/18964) |
| 48% (4206/8847) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (5825/13083) |
| 47% (1414/2995) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1847/3864) |
| 45% (10985/24215) | Return Points Win % | 45% (14077/31136) |
| 40% (24/36) | Slam W/L | 40% (16/24) |
| 39% (7/11) | Masters W/L | 45% (13/16) |
| 75% (33/11) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (50/51) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (51/57) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (232/141) | Challenger W/L | 60% (238/161) |
| 74% (82/29) | Futures W/L | 81% (13/3) |
| 60% (423/702) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (321/582) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (88/156) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (85/150) |
| 57% (129/228) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (108/200) |
| 88% (413/362) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (319/269) |
| 12% (413/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (319/50) |
| 22% (294/65) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (273/59) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
